A VERY COMPROMISED VIEW OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Article by Richard Crouch, Attorney at Law,
Crouch & Crouch, Arlington, Virginia; (703)
528-6700;
Copyright Richard Crouch 2002. Originally Published in Family Law News,
a Va.
State Bar Publication, Spring 2002
The Litigation Section of the American Bar Association is trying
very hard to sell more of its best-selling book on the law of privilege,
The Attorney-Client Privilege and the Work Product Doctrine, by Edna
Selan Epstein. The new 2001 edition, like all ABA paperbacks, is far from
cheap. It retails for $110, and $90 to Section members. The new edition
includes a detailed treatment of what constitutes legal advice, and what
legal advice is protected by the privilege, discussing as well just exactly
who is a client and who is not. Ms. Epstein emphasizes the number of cases
in which lawyers today think they are within the attorney-client privilege
when they are not. She points out how having another person present during
the initial client interview, whether it be family member, friend or "significant
other," will usually waive the privilege. Nor is she convinced that
a lawyer can broadly assert that information sought in discovery is protected,
and then give even a partial disclosure while attempting to rely on the
privilege. That generally blows the privilege for everything, in her opinion.
The Litigation Section has committed to supplement this book every year
or two years, and Ms. Epstein expects future supplements to provide a much
broader discussion of privilege in international litigation.
Crouch
& Crouch home page | Family
Law Information | Family
Law Articles Index
Disclaimer: Items are
not to be considered legal advice or to create any lawyer-client relationship.
Most articles include some obsolete information. In addition, taking any
legal information out of context, i.e., using it in a different court or
a subtly different kind of case, or without the training to understand all
of what it means or doing research to verify it, usually has disastrous
consequences.