UN, IMF TO COOPERATE ON SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, DISCOVERY
Article by John Crouch,
Attorney at Law, Crouch & Crouch, Arlington,
Virginia; (703) 528-6700;
Copyright John Crouch1999. Originally Published in Family Law News,
a Va.
State Bar Publication, Fall 1999
The International Monetary Fund has announced a new policy on cooperating
with support proceedings involving its employees. It will voluntarily comply
with payroll withholding orders, garnishment, etc., and with discovery requests.
The policy lists specific information that it will reveal in response to
subpoenas and other discovery requests. It also lists certain information
that it will require to be stated in payroll withholding orders, and other
guidelines and limits on how it will honor them. It also provides an internal
procedure that employees may use to contest the withholding. To get a copy
of the policy, call the IMF at 202-623-7000 and ask for Staff Bulletin 99/11
and its Attachment.
The Fund said that it was also considering allowing its pensions to be divided
by court order.
The IMF's announcement follows similar ones by the World Bank and the Inter-American
Development Bank, reported in our last issue.
The United Nations also has announced that it will allow garnishment, but
only on a case-by-case basis. The UN's policies and procedures for doing
this are reportedly still being formulated and may take a while to implement.
These developments are the result of the efforts of the State Department,
the A.B.A. Family Law Section, and the Rockville, Maryland, Center for the
Support of Families. At its annual meeting last month in Atlanta, the A.B.A.
House of Delegates called on the U.S. goverment to use whatever means are
at its disposal to induce these and other international organizations to
cooperate fully with family law cases involving their employees.
Crouch
& Crouch home page | Family
Law Information | Family
Law Articles Index
Disclaimer: Items are
not to be considered legal advice or to create any lawyer-client relationship.
Most articles include some obsolete information. In addition, taking any
legal information out of context, i.e., using it in a different court or
a subtly different kind of case, or without the training to understand all
of what it means or doing research to verify it, usually has disastrous
consequences.