Welcome to you. You have arrived at a plain text page in the LoveAllPeople.org network of web pages. To visit our regular HTML web pages, please copy the link below, and paste it into your Internet Explorer or other browser. Blessings to you. - Rev. Bill McGinnis Link to copy => http://www.loveallpeople.org/chapellinks.html A THOUSAND WITNESSES WOULD NOT CHANGE ANYTHING Dear Senator: We already know everything we need to know in order to make a decision. A thousand witnesses would not change anything, because there will still be reasonable doubt that Clinton committed the crimes he is charged with. And "reasonable doubt," coupled with the "presumption of innocence," assures that he will be acquitted by the Senate. The logic goes like this: "In our system of justice, an accused person is presumed to be innocent of a crime until he is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This presumption of innocence applies to all people, to presidents no less than to any other person. In my judgment, Clinton was not proven guilty of any crime beyond a reasonable doubt." And even if he somehow were found guilty of them, these offenses, in his case, are not serious enough to justify removing him from office. The particular perjury and obstruction he is charged with all arise from his personal sexual behavior and his normal human attempts to maintain privacy about it. The Paula Jones case was itself an illegal misuse of the courts, and the subsequent vendetta against Clinton was a gross abuse of prosecutorial power. The "danger to our system of justice" comes from these things, not from Clinton's behavior. There is no good reason to drag this messy process out any longer than needed. The Republicans have already lost Gingrich and Livingston in their misguided attempt to unseat Clinton. Do they now want to lose Starr, too? If witnesses are brought in, the Clinton team will destroy Kenneth Starr on national television, along with the House Republicans most closely associated with him. Some people might think this is a good idea, to get rid of them all forever, but it would not really be in the national interest. Our vigorous two-party system would not be helped by further personal destruction of Republican leaders. Already their third-string quarterback is running the House. It is in the national interest that both parties have their best players in the game. For all these reasons, I urge you, The Senate, to support Senator Byrd's motion to dismiss. May God bless you as you continue to work for the happiness and well-being of all Americans. Bill McGinnis <>< bmcgin@patriot.net http://www.patriot.net/users/bmcgin/ministries.html http://www.patriot.net/users/bmcgin/clintondefense.html