Searches for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI)


Twinkling Transmitters

My work in SETI was motivated by the fact that pulsar observations are affected by scintillation. Scintillations are intensity fluctuations. There can be two possibilities: Scintillations cause a source to be more intense than it otherwise should be or scintillations cause a source to be less intense than otherwise. Clearly, if scintillations have made a source stronger, it will be easier to find. Conversely, if the source is weaker than it otherwise would be, it will be more difficult to find.

If scintillations were equally likely to cause a source to get brighter or dimmer, they wouldn't be any big deal. On average, they would average out. However, the intensity fluctuations caused by scintillation are skewed. A scintillating source is more likely to be dimmed by scintillation than be made brighter. However, if made brighter, the source can be much brighter, e.g., 10x brighter.

The curious thing about SETI is that many radio surveys have detected candidate signals. These candidate signals have all the characteristics one would expect from an artificially generated signal (typically they're narrow-band, sometimes seen in a "special" reference frame), except one. When the locations (on the sky) are surveyed again, the candidates are not detected. Perhaps the most famous example is the Wow! signal, detected at the Ohio State University.

It's quite possible that these candidates are nothing more than some kind of exotic radio signal from a terrestrial source or they are a momentary glitch in the radio telescope being used. On the other hand, these candidates also behave exactly how one would expect a scintillating source to behave---a quick brightening followed by a huge dimming.

Additional details as well as some intriquing conclusions are discussed in our paper Now You See Them, Now You Don't. There's also a professional paper "Scintillation-induced Intermittency in SETI" by Cordes, Lazio, & Sagan.


A List of Locations of Potential Extraterrestrial Transmitters

From the META Program Conducted by Horowitz & Sagan

The following is Table 2 of Horowitz & Sagan (Five Years of Project META: An All-Sky Narrow-Band Radio Search for Extraterrestrial Signals, 1993, Astrophysical J., vol. 415, p. 218).

This table lists 37 narrow spectral features whose peak strength exceeded a pre-determined threshold (based on the search parameters). The search looked for narrow-band features (i.e., features whose width was about 0.05 Hz) in one of three rest frames, CMB, GBC, and LSR. The search was conducted at two different frequencies in these rest frames: 1420 MHz (21 cm) and 2840 MHz (10.5 cm).

Run A: 1420 MHz
RA[a]DEC[a]Peak[b]Freq[c]Frame-Pol[d]Type[e]Date[f]UT
00.87 57.528.0 -61.6GBC-H 16942+13:24
06.08 -3.529.8 -24.2CMB-H 16782 05:09
06.23 9.528.0 -41.1GBC-V 16822 02:41
11.58 31.528.2 -197.8GBC-V 16876 04:29
21.15-21.029.0 53.0LSR-V 16737 23:08
21.98 38.533.6 170.7CMB-H 46894 13:41
Run B: 2840 MHz
RADECPeakFreqFrame-PolTypeDateUT
00.82 3.25 29.4 91.9 CMB-H 1 7735+ 09:15
01.30 -22.00 28.8 64.0 CMB-V 1 7577+ 20:06
01.83 7.00 28.2 -189.9 GBC-H 1 7769 08:03
05.73 6.00 29.2 -184.0 GBC-H 1 7326 17:02
08.00 -8.50 746.6 58.7 LSR-V 1 7415+ 13:27
08.03 11.00 30.2 -170.0 LSR-V 1 7301 20:58
08.08 7.00 28.8 45.9 CMB-H 1 7769 14:17
08.67 45.75 29.8 18.4 CMB-H 1 7159+ 06:57
08.95 -15.75 75.4 85.0 GBC-V 1 7452+ 11:59
10.43 -21.25 29.0 154.0 LSR-H 1 7481+ 11:34
11.23 58.00 28.4 -34.4 GBC-V 1 7230 04:52
14.30 57.50 31.8 -134.6 CMB-H 1 7228 08:04
14.65 46.50 31.8 25.1 GBC-H 1 7164 12:36
15.47 -18.00 28.2 185.8 LSR-H 1 7599+ 08:51
17.10 2.00 29.2 83.8 GBC-V 1 7351 02:47
18.05 23.50 28.0 -99.8 GBC-V 1 7061 22:45
18.37 -19.50 52.8 -169.2 GBC-H 1 7467 20:24
18.45 38.50 28.2 0.4 LSR-H 1 7127 18:49
18.67 -23.25 44.4 9.6 CMB-H 1 7493+ 18:59
18.68 -22.25 28.8 -1.0 LSR-H 1 7565+ 14:17
19.18 -0.50 28.0 -73.7 GBC-H 1 7699 06:00
19.67 -23.00 29.0 66.4 CMB-H 1 7560 15:36
20.03 30.75 33.2 -31.0 GBC-H 1 7092 22:41
Run C: 1420 MHz
RADECPeakFreqFrame-PolTypeDateUT
01.70 33.5 28.8 -15.9 LSR-H 3 8014+ 15:47
02.90 32.0 30.2 197.1 LSR-V 1 8022+ 16:28
03.10 58.0 224.0 -169.6 LSR-H 1 7847+ 04:12
12.32 16.0 29.0 -115.0 CMB-H 1 8160+ 16:49
12.73 -12.5 30.6 152.3 CMS-H 1 8364+ 03:51
15.55 17.0 28.6 -50.1 GBC-V 1 8154+ 20:26
19.57 47.5 35.6 -164.6 LSR-H 1 7916 16:06
23.72 8.5 33.0 -28.5 LSR-V 2 8216+ 00:35

a) The RA and DEC coordinates are the coordinates at the epoch of observation, i.e., they are not B1950 or J2000, though they can be converted to such.

b) In units of average power per channel; assuming noise statistics, the strongest expected signal is 31.7 in these units; in these units 30 corresponds to approximately 1.7E-23 W m^-2, or given their channel bandwidth, 34,000 Jy.

c) offset in kHz from nominal observing frequency

d) CMB = cosmic microwave background rest frame; GBC = Galactic barycenter (i.e., center of mass of Galaxy); LSR = Local Standard of Rest; H = horizontal polarization(EW); V = vertical polarization(NS)

e) 1 - single channel peak; 2 - < 10 channel peak; 3 - ~ 20 channel peak; 4 - wide peak;

f) calendar days since JD 2440000 (1968 May 23); a + indicates the same declination was observed on 2 consecutive days


T. Joseph W. Lazio <jlazio@patriot.net>
Valid HTML 4.0!
Last modified: Sat Dec 1 14:01:08 2001